1956, Central Travancore

2019 [MALAYALAM]

Action / Drama

2
IMDb Rating 7.1/10 10 68 68

Plot summary

Kora and his brother Onan gather four men to go on a gaur hunt in order to make some quick money. Their journey progresses through their dreams, desires, fears, fantasies and struggles. Distanced from their families and loved ones, sharing stories help them remember and appreciate their inescapable pasts and make bonds. When the real and imagined nature turn out to be larger than their will and strength could handle, they learn the harsh realities of the endeavor they have taken up.


Uploaded by: FREEMAN
April 21, 2022 at 12:21 PM

Director

Top cast

720p.WEB 1080p.WEB
863.45 MB
1194*720
English 2.0
NR
us  
24 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds ...
1.57 GB
1792*1080
English 2.0
NR
us  
24 fps
1 hr 34 min
Seeds ...

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by PimpinAinttEasy 6 / 10

Americanization/Europization of Indian poverty and desperation

I have tried my best with Malayali art films. I watched a few films made by Adoor who praised Don Palathara recently. I cannot stand the films of veteran mentor Adoor or prodigy Palathara. I believe most of these Malayali art films get a sympathy vote by bores. Even the great entertaining Elia Kazan dabbled in the cinema verite style with The Visitors (1972).

I did not even understand or for that matter agree with some of the aesthetic choices. Why weren't the hunters faces shown clearly? Who was who? What purpose was served by making the faces of these characters indecipherable or anonymous? Palathara manages to exoticize Indian poverty and desperation with some pretty frames.

The dialogs were mostly tall tales told by the hunters and patriarchs. The film was slow as hell once the hunt began. It fell apart completely once the hunt began. There were many pretty frames. But it was all so dull. I guess it is dumb to expect a conventional narrative and aesthetics in an art film like this. Anyway, the lives and attitudes of Mallu Christians who occupied the high ranges of Kerala is one of the films themes. What did the final frame with the gun stuck between the rocks really mean? It was almost as if the director did not care about the audience or something. What was his purpose? His pomposity was not justified in the end. I mean, everything about the hunt was so flimsy. I felt like the writer/director knew nothing about the milieu and he concocted a bunch of tall tales. Inserted some unbelievably pretty frames. What was he trying to say? He had nothing to say except be a pompous ass.

Reviewed by / 10

Reviewed by rachelbrouder 8 / 10

First review!!

I rarely review films on IMDb, but I decided to make an exception for this since no one before me has reviewed this film. This film was recently added to MUBI and it is the reason I know of this film's existence. I liked this film! I didn't understand all of it, maybe should give it a second watch. The film was slow and relaxing, consisting of a lot of conversations (many of these conversations being about fables) and wide silent shots. The film is in black and white, but it's not completely monochrome. You can see dark, desaturated green in the leaves and the grass for example. The film also depicts the patriarchal society without hitting you over the head with it. It's a good movie and I'd recommend you watch it on MUBI if you can (MUBI offers a 7-day free trial, if yuo don't want to subscribe to another streaming service).

Read more IMDb reviews

1 Comment

Be the first to leave a comment